SOSV
How to get into SOSV according to the founders that did it
Our take
Best if you are an early-stage hardware, biotech, or cross-border founder who wants a check, a program, and a global network for years. A weak trade if you are further along with specific local-market needs, or want industry-tuned mentor matching — the thing founders say SOSV gets wrong.
Acceptance
~3%
Equity
4-7%
Funding
$150K
Duration
3-6 months
Stage
Pre-Seed to Seed
HQ
Princeton, NJ
We asked the founders how SOSV really went.
Every interview behind this page is one we ran ourselves. The numbers and quotes come straight from founders who went through SOSV, in their own words.
Who SOSV is for, and who should skip it.
Best for
- You are early, anywhere from a strong idea to seed, in hardware, biotech, deep tech, or a cross-border market
- You want direct capital plus a structured program that drills business modeling, fundraising, and a demo day pitch
- You will actually use a global portfolio network for years, including warm intros when you enter a new market
- You can commit full time and show up in person for the core program
Skip it if
- You are later stage with very specific local-market needs the program is not built around
- You want mentor matching precisely tuned to your stage and your industry
- You cannot commit full time or be present in person for the core program
- You only want a check, not the curriculum, the demo day, or the network
What it's actually like at SOSV
SOSV runs several programs under one roof. There is HAX for hardware, IndieBio for biotech, the cross-border Orbit program once known as MOX, and a crypto arm called D-Lab, and each one runs at its own tempo. For most founders the core experience is intense and in person. Donatas Smailys took Billo through the Taiwan program and still talks about it.
Taiwan ended up being one of the best startup experiences I've had. Hard work, but a lot of fun, and the energy of the room owed a lot to William Bao Bean and the way he thinks.
The days are full and the calendar is not really yours. Aizaz Nayyer joined the first Orbit One cohort with Oliv and described the pace.
The time commitment was full-time, with sessions running from early morning to late afternoon and our calendars pre-blocked across the three months. It was intense, but the structure is what made it work.
Mentorship runs on a rotating, speed-dating format, roughly five minutes with one mentor before you move to the next, and the support has a long tail that outlasts the program. Donatas still takes calls from his mentors years later, and Aizaz had a growth call with an SOSV mentor the same day he spoke with us. For Scarlett Li, who built Zebra Labs through the old SOSV China Accelerator, the community around all of that was the real milestone.
Being part of SOSV meant I had peers and an organization to lean on, which cut that isolation down a lot.
Not every SOSV program looks like that. Kamel Aouane went through D-Lab, the crypto arm, where there was no fixed schedule, no mandatory in-person sessions, and no assigned mentors to report to. What you get depends heavily on which program you join and what stage you are at when you arrive.
What the check is really worth, and what you give for it
The deal is simpler than the program. SOSV's standard ticket is around $250,000, and its published terms put the equity at 4 to 7%. Unlike accelerators that hand you a fixed check the day you join, SOSV often invests as part of your active fundraising round. Aizaz Nayyer laid out how it worked for Oliv.
SOSV invests directly as part of the accelerator, with a standard ticket of $250,000. That's not gated on demo day, it's part of the package the moment you join.
The dollar figure moves with the program. Kamel Aouane's D-Lab pre-seed was $300,000, put in jointly with Advanced Blockchain. And the money is rarely the part founders remember most. For Kamel, the value was runway and the nudge to go all in.
The big moment wasn't the money itself, it was the commitment. Two of us still had jobs at that point, and the investment gave us six months to a year of runway. That was the green light to quit and go full-time.
There is more than one tier to it. The first check is often followed by a small follow-on, and SOSV keeps investing through later rounds when a company performs. The demo day at the end is the other half of the deal, the room where founders meet outside investors. Aizaz met the backer who led him to acquire Oliv on his own demo day, and that introduction mattered to him more than the check did.
How founders actually got in
Very few SOSV founders got in through a cold online form. The pattern is a relationship or a chance meeting that turned into a pitch. Donatas met William Bao Bean at an after-party in Hong Kong. Scarlett Li had known him for over a decade. Kamel's team was scouted at a crypto hackathon called ETH Global. Aizaz chased him on LinkedIn for weeks before a co-founder finally got through and pushed Aizaz onto a 2 AM pitch that somehow landed.
Donatas summed up what that says about getting in.
The takeaway for me is how much relationships still matter in this world, even when there's a formal process sitting behind them.
When there is a formal pipeline, it starts with an online application, then a pitch call with William Bao Bean, then several follow-up calls that dig into your business model, your team, your vision, and your early metrics. Founders put the online filter at under 2%, though everyone who clears it describes a lifetime of support that changes how you read that number. At the early stage SOSV is buying the founder more than the idea.
What the founders said actually helps you get in, in their own words.
- Show prior wins, even from outside this startup, since a past exit or venture counts for a lot
- Lead with your team and a sharp value proposition, and let the timing make your case
- Commit fully, because SOSV backs founders who are all in rather than running it on the side
- Bring a clear product vision, which can be the thing that tips the decision
- Point to tangible results you have already delivered
One edge came up more than any other. A working product or a warm introduction will carry you further than a polished form, so if you can ship something real or get in front of the team in person, do it.
The founders we talked to.
Alumni include Bitfury, Impossible Foods, Bitmain, SOPHiA GENETICS.
Want the mentorship without the accelerator?
An accelerator's real value is the people who have done it before. GrowthMentor gives you that on its own. Unlimited 1:1 calls with founders and operators, from $50 a month, no equity, no relocating for a cohort.
Format
- SOSV
- 3-6 month cohort accelerator, multiple vertical programs
Cost
- SOSV
- $250K standard ticket, 4-7% equity
Time to value
- SOSV
- 3-6 months
Commitment
- SOSV
- Full-time and in person for most programs
Selectivity
- SOSV
- ~3% accepted
The network
- SOSV
- Global deep-tech portfolio, lifetime support
What you get
- SOSV
- Capital, a demo day, and a lasting network
From $50 a month · no equity.
Questions founders ask about SOSV.
Founders described the online application filter as under 2%, while SOSV's published figure sits around 3%. Either way it is steep, with a pitch call to partner William Bao Bean followed by several rounds of follow-up calls before you get in.
SOSV's published terms put it at 4 to 7%. The standard ticket founders described was around $250,000, often invested as part of your live fundraising round rather than a fixed check on entry, with follow-on investment available as the company grows.
You apply or get scouted, pitch William Bao Bean, then go through follow-up calls before joining one of SOSV's vertical programs such as the hardware or biotech track. The core program is full-time and structured around business modeling, fundraising, and a demo day pitch to investors.
Three to six months depending on the program. Oliv ran about three months, Zebra Labs closer to six or seven, and the crypto track with D-Lab had no fixed schedule at all.
It depends on your stage. Early founders in hardware, biotech, or a cross-border market told us the capital, the structure, and the long-term network were hard to find elsewhere. Later-stage founders with very specific local needs said the value was thinner, and the one consistent gripe was mentor matching that did not always fit their industry.



